New Bigfoot Video and Audio

A notable post this morning from Larry Surface on his blog:

“Success at last!! After many months of patient waiting, I caught a Bigfoot on Video! Those who have followed my blog may remember that I said it would be necessary to use moon light without any infrared lighting, well that has been the case.”

Click here to view the video

Also, check out these audio posts:

Two or Three Bigfoots Whooping


Two Bigfoot Howling

Larry’s profile states: “My experience was gained by hunting, trapping, farming, and timber cutting. My goal is to prove the existence of Sasquatch so they can have legal protection…”

He also presents several purported findings in the way of photos of “stone tools” and “language recordings” that may be worth a gander.

While proof may soon be a moot point (with the Ketchum DNA report), the information those like Larry are attempting to collect may ultimately contribute to our understanding of the Wild Folks and I, for one, appreciate his willingness to share these things for our consideration.

Many thanks for Heinz Loewen for the heads up this morning.

You’re welcome to share your thoughts on the above… below. :)

My perspective: This video is simply presented here for your consideration and discussion. Kindly don’t shoot the messenger. *grin* My personal take on it? I don’t know what to think. I had to watch it several times before I saw what looks like short hair standing up on the upper part of the shoulders beneath the neck. If it is a bald human, it’s one with a very hairy back. Pay close attention at the :23-:24 mark. I suspect this was filmed through a starlight device… unlike infrared cameras, starlight scopes and starlight camera lenses amplify ambient light and are therefore passive, rather than active. That makes sense to me… I have come to believe that Sasquatches can see infrared light clearly.

Albinism is occasionally reported in Sasquatch sightings. There are numerous examples of this in my database… I’ll cull them out for you in an upcoming post and we’ll take a look at them. Many years ago, I noticed a correlation between reports of albinism (there are varying degrees) and “crippled” foot tracks, like those found in Bossburg. I’ll delve more deeply into that in an upcoming post as well.

For what it’s worth, here are some photos of albinism in human and non-human primates:



If you enjoyed this post, please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

21 replies on “New Bigfoot Video and Audio”

  1. Captain Insano says:

    I`m sorry but that looks human to me.Like an older guy with a bald head.Not a debunker.Just callin it as i see it.

  2. Captain Insano says:

    also If that a bigfoot its wearing a shirt as you can see the stiching.

  3. Sandy says:

    Hi there. It’s just a chap in his 60s or 70s surely – why do you think it is otherwise? If this was a bigfoot then it would prove that the Patterson creature is not one – they are totally different in appearance.

  4. Anonymous says:

    Oh, dear. That’s just an old man in the video, an owl in the first audio clip, and two coyotes (yes, they do make that sound) in the second. Maybe this guy does have activity, but none of this is it, and you can’t make something out of nothing no matter how hard you want to.

  5. natalie k says:

    I don’t think you can make blanket statements as to “what” Bigfoot looks like according to the Patterson video. From eyewitness testimony Bigfoot apparently has a long range of sizes, colors, and behaviors – from huge to small, from black to blonde (depending on the region), and from agressive (stone throwing) to running away. So….depending on the gender, the region, and the environment of the encounter you will have ALL kinds of descriptions. This one looks like an old man to me. His hair is short and he kind of stoops and limps a little bit. Anyhow, good luck with getting a better picture of him.

  6. Jeff says:

    looked like a cat in the back ground that watched everything and never moved? not sure it bigfoot.

  7. Debra B. says:

    I have looked at the recording over and over what ever he got was hairy, the slumped walking suggest an older being. I do think that there can be more than one look to the creatures. As every one knows when humans age they tend to change their looks. Why not try to think the same way for Bigfoot? I know that in Hoopa, CA they have stories of 2 creatures. The Big Man and The Little Man of the Woods. If you listen to the stories of the Native American Tribes you will find a lot of different looks to the Big Foot like beings.

  8. rhuck says:

    Well for the non believers and those who think this might just be an old man, I believe after this video is slowed way down we should be able to get a much closer look at this creature, and then we should be able to view this old guys face much closer! I for one am thinking that this is the real deal, at least from what I have been watching anyway!

  9. I see his shirt collar! He appears to be wearing a sweater over it. Egads. In fact, it looks like Larry Surface himself.

    Also, I can’t hear anything but an owl and some canids in those audio files.

  10. Darrell McClanahan says:

    I watched the video many times and froze it at many different points. My best guess is that it’s a for-real sasquatch “teenager.” The shoulders and back show distinct musculature and a fairly thick coat of frizzy hair that goes continuously up from the back and shoulders to cover the head. At one point, the shoulder musculature seems to merge into the base of the skull. The eyes seem sunken under distinct brow ridges. Can’t get a good determination of the nose shape, but it appears a bit flattened at one point. Of course there’s the possibility that some frizzy-haired person wearing a super-frizzy wool sweater of the same color and texture as his hair walked up Larry’s house in the dark, and it’s possible it’s totally faked, but then why wouldn’t he have picked a physique more like Patty’s to present? This figure looks very much like the one a friend saw up close in Oklahoma a few years ago. I give it a thumbs up! Maybe with some enhancement, we’ll see more later.

  11. Darrell McClanahan says:

    BTW, I personally didn’t see anything that looked like a shirt or any stitching. What I interpret the covering to be is unkempt hair at least 2 or 3 inches long.

  12. Joseph Robertson says:

    It is so easy to mis-read photos when they are not ( for one reason or another ) in focus. I meant to say, read or misread. I would repeat this with cat food out and a focus set closer and maybe another camera like a Go-Pro from a different angle. Game cameras can use a flash and get real serious detail.

  13. Ravenmadd says:

    more like big what?

  14. Bing says:

    The video looks to be another anomalous figure. Inconclusive on the video.

    That audio was the real McCoy! Those were Sasquatch alright..without a doubt. There was no howl about it. Those Sasquatch were singing. Singing within the subject of their own lives. Another cutural aspect of Sasquatch-loud and clear.

  15. Bill H. says:

    Seems convenient to me… I dunno???

  16. Mike L says:

    video, an alien? a ghost of a sasquatch? :), sorry not a squatch, yes as stated above, 1st sound owls, 2nd coyotes..thats not a squatch whooping, no way…keep trying

  17. uncletoad says:

    Most reports I have read detail in their descriptions that there is no discernable neck, either due to hair cover or the head being situated farther forward on the spine or both. This individual seems to have a very human sized head atop a very human looking neck. As he comes into frame, there seems to be a very prominent nose and ear, which again, in most detailed descriptions, the nose is considered flatter against the face and wider, much less prominent. The other ear is seen as the subject comes back into frame, though, hair cover could account for the lack of prominent ears in most descriptions. I really didn’t see any indication of clothing, neckline, stitching, etc. The fuzziness of the hair appeared normal, no coats, shirts or costumes. The shoulder blades do not look to be covered with any material either, but seem, once again, very prominent. Unfortunately, just not enough detail. If I HAD to choose, I would say it was a man.

  18. Stinkyfoot says:

    It looks like old man rivers to me.

  19. Mike Brogan says:

    Well I’ll take it at face value,looks like Fur to me,as for the Audio the Howling sounds like Coyotes, or are they higher pitched? unsure

  20. Buffalospirit says:

    Interesting. I agree with your comment that this can all ultimately add up to helping create a better understanding of these wild folk! Your site continues to be, in my opinion, a great place to see and hear about the latest activities happening in the world of Bigfoot research.

  21. Freda55 says:

    Looks like the VIDEO is taken down. :( As Larry explains:

    “I have been asked by Ms Ketchum to remove the video from public view because they need it for evidence”

Comments are closed.